In trying to justify abortion, some argue “That is not a baby in the womb. It is not a baby until it is born.” Question: Then what is it? An amorphous mass like a tumor? It’s of no more consequence to remove it than to remove a tumor? Think seriously. It moves. It responds to stimuli. It will eventually BE a baby, a child, a teenager, an adult, a parent, a grandparent.
Question to abortion rights advocates: Why would a woman want to abort her child?”
Answers are basically the same; “She can’t take care of it.” “Having a baby would be inconvenient.”
Question: “Then by that logic, is it okay for a mother to kill a month-old child because she can’t take care of it or it is inconvenient?”
Finish the sentence for me;
It’s okay to kill a baby in the womb when…….
It’s justifiable to kill that baby in the womb because of…..
Abortionists are justifying murder. It’s as simple as that. Their “right to choose” ended when they exercised their right to engage in unprotected sex. Choices have consequences.
Killing a baby will have eternal consequences.